Re: PG vs macOS Mojave - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
Date
Msg-id 31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG vs macOS Mojave  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 2 Nov 2018, at 15:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use?  We need to choose
>> one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's
>> wrap.

> #1 is the option that appeals to me the most, mostly because it removes all
> possible ambiguity of when/if it’s required compared to #2.

I'm sort of leaning in that direction too, after sleeping on it.
It's also closer to what we already shipped in 11.0 than #2 is.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP Patch: Add a function that returns binary JSONB as a bytea