Re: PG vs macOS Mojave - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
Date
Msg-id 18304.1541169741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG vs macOS Mojave  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PG vs macOS Mojave  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Here's a lightly-tested patch for that approach.

Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use?  We need to choose
one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's
wrap.

The main argument in favor of #1 (restore use of -isysroot) is fear that
Apple's going to force us into that sometime soon anyhow, so we might as
well just bite the bullet instead of inserting weird workarounds to avoid
it.  But perhaps that isn't going to happen.  If it doesn't, then #2
(hack PLPerl and PLTcl include switches only) should result in slightly
less pain for people in Jakob's situation.  But either patch does offer
a workaround for that case.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval