Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Date
Msg-id 18378.1248736572@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
List pgsql-general
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> It depends, 8.3 and 8.4 are not compatible by default (because of
> --integer-datetimes). So, yeah if you are running Debian/Ubuntu but if
> you are running Cent/RH with the defaults, pg_migrator isn't going to
> work unless you compile Pg from source.

Oh?  You think RH/Cent is going to change that default now?  Think again.

Of course the real question is whether you trust pg_migrator to not eat
your data.  Those who are afraid to trust 8.4.0 will probably not care
to trust pg_migrator for a few versions yet either...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Terry Lee Tucker
Date:
Subject: C Function Question
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?