Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Date
Msg-id 1248728928.14534.16.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 22:48 +0200, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Tory M Blue wrote on 27.07.2009 22:45:
> > And those that have multiple TB's of data, weee another dump and
> > restore upgrade (pfffft!!!!!)
>
> Isn't that what pg_migrator is for?

It depends, 8.3 and 8.4 are not compatible by default (because of
--integer-datetimes). So, yeah if you are running Debian/Ubuntu but if
you are running Cent/RH with the defaults, pg_migrator isn't going to
work unless you compile Pg from source.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Running vacuumdb -a taking too long