Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable
Date
Msg-id 1768fc5f-b186-7c8e-75db-9e113d0ebe3a@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable
List pgsql-bugs
On 06/08/2017 11:09 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:45:20AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 06/07/2017 06:49 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>> > I ended up narrowing it down to 4 tables (one parent and 3 partitions)
>> > in order to demonstrate policy sorting and order of RLS/partition
>> > constraint checking. It should be much more straight-forward now, but
>> > let me know if there are any further recommended changes.
>>
>> Thanks, will take a look towards the end of the day.
>
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

I started reviewing the latest patch last night and will try to finish
up this afternoon (west coast USA time).

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: hieppso194@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] BUG #14696: true cardinality estimation
Next
From: Cocco Gianfranco
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64