Re: Unicode support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Unicode support
Date
Msg-id 15393.1239732637@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unicode support  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Unicode support  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I think there's a good case for some functions implementing the various 
> Unicode normalization functions, though.

I have no objection to that so long as the code footprint is in line
with the utility gain (i.e. not all that much).  If we have to bring in
ICU or something similar to make it happen, the cost/benefit ratio looks
pretty bad.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: add columns created and altered to pg_proc and pg_class
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode support