On mån, 2012-01-16 at 17:25 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> The most reasonable answer to this is for people to publish a git repo
> URL in addition to the "official" submission of changes to the list in
> patch form.
Note that the original complaint was that for the occasional reviewer,
the current system takes at least 5 partially redundant steps in two
different systems. I doubt that adding a third system and more
partially redundant steps it going to help that.
I don't have anything against the general idea, but it won't address the
original point.
