Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths
Date
Msg-id 4F159B9A.9040801@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to WIP patch for parameterized inner paths  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/17/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, since I see other committers sending in patches the day after the
> nominal commitfest deadline, I don't feel too bad about being a bit late
> as well.

To clarify the fairness standard here:  submitting a patch before the 
CommitFest deadline, then adding it to the app, means that we will try 
very hard to find a reviewer for the submission during that CF.  It's 
setting a worst-case bound on how long someone who contributes will have 
to wait for feedback.  That delay, how long it would take before someone 
saw community feedback after they sent in a patch, used to be far less 
predictable.

Something like this, sent just after the deadline, won't be assigned a 
reviewer by the CommitFest manager until the next CF.  That doesn't mean 
it won't be reviewed anyway.  Also, submissions that fix a regression, 
like this one, can easily end up on a fast track unrelated to the normal 
schedule.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] sepgsql's DROP Permission checks
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)