Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date
Msg-id 12231.1193152584@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Responses Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:42 , Tom Lane wrote:
>> apart_hword    Part of hyphenated word, all ASCII letters
>> part_hword    Part of hyphenated word, all letters
>> numpart_hword    Part of hyphenated word, mixed letters and digits

> Is there a rationale for using these instead of hword_apart,  
> hword_part and hword_numpart?

Only that the category names were constructed that way in the contrib
module, and so this would seem familiar to existing tsearch2 users.
However, we are changing enough other details of the tsearch
configuration that maybe that's not a very strong consideration.

I have no objection in principle to choosing nicer names, except
that I would like to avoid a long-drawn-out discussion.  Is there
general approval of Michael's suggestion?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ts_rewrite aggregate API seems mighty ugly
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing