Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date
Msg-id 20071023152852.GE18013@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
> > On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:42 , Tom Lane wrote:
> >> apart_hword    Part of hyphenated word, all ASCII letters
> >> part_hword    Part of hyphenated word, all letters
> >> numpart_hword    Part of hyphenated word, mixed letters and digits
> 
> > Is there a rationale for using these instead of hword_apart,  
> > hword_part and hword_numpart?
> 
> Only that the category names were constructed that way in the contrib
> module, and so this would seem familiar to existing tsearch2 users.
> However, we are changing enough other details of the tsearch
> configuration that maybe that's not a very strong consideration.
> 
> I have no objection in principle to choosing nicer names, except
> that I would like to avoid a long-drawn-out discussion.  Is there
> general approval of Michael's suggestion?

+1

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing