AW: Postgres Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Subject AW: Postgres Replication
Date
Msg-id 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA68796336831B@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: AW: Postgres Replication  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Although 
> Postgres-R is a synchronous approach, I believe it is the closest to 
> the goal mentioned above. Here is an abstract of the advantages.

If you only want synchronous replication, why not simply use triggers ?
All you would then need is remote query access and two phase commit,
and maybe a little script that helps create the appropriate triggers.

Doing a replicate all or nothing approach that only works synchronous
is imho not flexible enough.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: large object implementation
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: Implicit order-by in Postgresql?