Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Copeland
Subject Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Date
Msg-id 1034343056.4863.53.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  (Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk>)
Responses Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  (Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk>)
List pgsql-hackers
I'd be curious to hear in a little more detail what constitutes "not
good" for postgres on a mosix cluster.

Greg


On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 06:15, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:29:53PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >
> > Well, I don't think adding support for multiple slaves to usogres would be that
> > problematic. Of course if you want to load balance your application queries,
> > application has to be aware of that. I will not do sending requests to a mosix
> > cluster anyway.
>
> Have already tested postgres on a mosix cluster, and as expected results
> are not good.  (although mosix does the correct thing in keeping all the
> database backend processes on one node).
>
>     Anuradha
>
> --
>
> Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1)
>
> Remember: Silly is a state of Mind, Stupid is a way of Life.
>         -- Dave Butler
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Antti Haapala
Date:
Subject: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.