Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shridhar Daithankar
Subject Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Date
Msg-id 3DA72222.20021.A0C58DF@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Responses Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  (Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11 Oct 2002 at 8:30, Greg Copeland wrote:

> I'd be curious to hear in a little more detail what constitutes "not
> good" for postgres on a mosix cluster.
> On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 06:15, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:29:53PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > Have already tested postgres on a mosix cluster, and as expected results
> > are not good.  (although mosix does the correct thing in keeping all the
> > database backend processes on one node).

Well, I guess in kind of replication we are talking here, the performance will 
be enhanced only if separate instances of psotgresql runs on separate machine. 
Now if mosix kernel applies some AI and puts all of them on same machine, it 
isn't going to be any good for the purpose replication is deployed.

I guess that's what she meant..

ByeShridhar

--
User n.:    A programmer who will believe anything you tell him.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
Next
From: Mario Weilguni
Date:
Subject: Re: number of attributes in page files?