Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Anuradha Ratnaweera
Subject Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Date
Msg-id 20021011111500.GA8065@lklug.pdn.ac.lk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Responses Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:29:53PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> 
> Well, I don't think adding support for multiple slaves to usogres would be that 
> problematic. Of course if you want to load balance your application queries, 
> application has to be aware of that. I will not do sending requests to a mosix 
> cluster anyway.

Have already tested postgres on a mosix cluster, and as expected results
are not good.  (although mosix does the correct thing in keeping all the
database backend processes on one node).
Anuradha

-- 

Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1)

Remember: Silly is a state of Mind, Stupid is a way of Life.    -- Dave Butler

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Next
From: snpe
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Out of memory error on huge resultset