Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Anuradha Ratnaweera
Subject Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Date
Msg-id 20021014055236.GA23044@lklug.pdn.ac.lk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 08:30:55AM -0500, Greg Copeland wrote:
>
> I'd be curious to hear in a little more detail what constitutes "not
> good" for postgres on a mosix cluster.

It seems that almost all the postgres processes remain in the `home'
node.

Please notice that I am not underestimating Mosix in any way.  We have
tested many programs from our parallel processing project with extreme
success on our mosix cluster.
Anuradha

-- 

Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1)

Ginger snap.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c
Next
From: Anuradha Ratnaweera
Date:
Subject: Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases