Re: syslog by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Giles Lean
Subject Re: syslog by default?
Date
Msg-id 10243.1000245371@nemeton.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: syslog by default?  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I know it can have an adverse effect on a mail server, is syslog going
> to give us any performance hits?

Yes.  On some platforms (HP-UX at least) applications can stall ~2s
retrying if syslogd is not reading the messages written to its pipe.

syslogd also has a reputation for using too much CPU under load, but
this is annecdotal only -- I've not seen such a situation myself.

Regards,

Giles



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Beta timing
Next
From: Martín Marqués
Date:
Subject: Re: syslog by default?