Re: syslog by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martín Marqués
Subject Re: syslog by default?
Date
Msg-id 20010911221456.69C462AB44@bugs.unl.edu.ar
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: syslog by default?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: syslog by default?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mar 11 Sep 2001 02:07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > There was a discussion about --enable-syslog by default. What was the
> > consensus? I think this is a good one.
>
> Yes, I thought we decided it should be the default too.

There was a discusion about log rotation last week, so, where are we going? 
Pipe the output of postmaster to a log rotator like apaches logrotate, or are 
we going to use syslog and have the syslog log rotator do the rotation?

Just a dought I had.

Saludos... :-)

-- 
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués                  |        mmarques@unl.edu.ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA |       Centro de Telematica                      Universidad Nacional
        del Litoral
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Giles Lean
Date:
Subject: Re: syslog by default?
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: syslog by default?