Re: syslog by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vince Vielhaber
Subject Re: syslog by default?
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.30.0109110617500.32796-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: syslog by default?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: syslog by default?  (Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > There was a discussion about --enable-syslog by default. What was the
> > consensus? I think this is a good one.
>
> Yes, I thought we decided it should be the default too.

I know it can have an adverse effect on a mail server, is syslog going
to give us any performance hits?

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net        56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo
atPop4 Networking       Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com      Online Giftshop Superstore
http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: enable-unicode-conversion option?
Next
From: Ryouichi Matsuda
Date:
Subject: Patch for doc/jdbc.sgml