On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 15:35, Brian Bruns wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2002, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
>
> > What is the relation of DRDA to SQL/CLI (SQL Call Level Interface, part
> > 3 of the standard) ?
>
> DRDA, SQL 9x, and SQL/CLI (ODBC) form a complimentary set of standards.
>
> SQL 9x obviously specifies the SQL language and constructs. SQL/CLI
> addressses application portability with an API. DRDA on the other hand is
> a bits on the wire protocol. So one would have a program using the ODBC
> API to send DRDA over the network to invoke SQL on the server.
But I guess that you can't fake PREPARE/EXECUTE on client side anymore
if you want to be DRDA compatible?
Or is DRDA so low-level that it does not care what info it carries ?
Does DRDA have standard representation of datatypes on wire ?
If so, how will postgres extendable datatypes fit in there ?
I know that postgres's system tables have two sets of type i/o functionstypinput | regproc | typoutput |
regproc | typreceive | regproc | typsend | regproc |
which are currently initialised to the same real functions
hannu=# select count(*) from pg_type where typoutput <> typsend or
typinput <> typreceive;count
------- 0
(1 row)
I suspect thet the typreceive and typsend were planned for some common
network representation, but such usage has probaly gone untested for a
very long time.
----------------
Hannu
