Hello Bruce,
Thursday, November 7, 2002, 12:56:57 AM, you wrote:
BM> I have thrown out the idea and some felt that if we could get PITR and
BM> Win32, that would be enough for a release, even if we could get it done
BM> in a month or two.
BM> However, I see your point that releasing too often causes too many
BM> initdb's.
BM> What do others want, a regular 4-6 month cycle or a shorter one?
The initdb will be needed, no matter the release time is a month or
six, right ? There is no point in holding technology that is ready.
Those who don't need the release, can wait for the next one and avoid
the initdb.
Also, as a snapshot, the Win32 version won't get properly tested as it
would be as a regular release, specially because most of the
developers here work on UNIX. The best field testing would be
deploying a regular release to the hundreds of Win32 users that wait
for years for the Win32 version...
... just my thoughts, of course.
-------------
Best regards,Steve Howe mailto:howe@carcass.dhs.org
