Re: Outstanding patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Outstanding patches
Date
Msg-id 5578.1036646825@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Outstanding patches  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Outstanding patches  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Re: Outstanding patches  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
Re: Outstanding patches  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I will be applying outstanding 7.4 patches on Friday:
>     http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
> If anyone wants those rejected/modified, please let me know.

array upper/lower bound: missing doc updates, otherwise seems okay.

\pset pager always: I thought we had rejected that idea in favor of
making the whether-to-use-pager decision pay attention to width as
well as number of lines.

temp tables: difficult to comment on a message that does not include the
proposed patch.

CLUSTER ALL patch: I have a problem with this, specifically the fact
that it changes CLUSTER into a multi-transaction operation.  That
renders CLUSTER non-rollbackable and not callable from functions.
After all the work we went to to make CLUSTER rollbackable, this seems
like a giant step backward.

CREATE SEQUENCE syntax changes: did we decide whether SQL99's notion of
a sequence is close enough to ours that migrating to their syntax would
be a good idea, and not just a source of confusion?  I seem to recall
some doubts being voiced about this (by Peter?), and I'm not sure we
resolved them.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.3b5 contrib compile problem
Next
From: Steve Howe
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 port