The press release for 8.1 *not* the time to argue BSD vs. GPL. We have two good pieces of news to report (adoption and
features). Let the reporters focus on those two items.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd@commandprompt.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:10 PM
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org; Jim Nasby
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Release, 3rd draft
>
>>On the BSD/GPL horse, what about...
>>
>>PostgreSQL is distributed under a BSD license, which unlike GPL licensed
>>software, allows use and distribution without fees for both commercial
>>and non-commercial applications.
>
>
> I am *NOT* picking a fight with the FSF. Also, many people (myself
> included) do not agree with MySQL's draconian interpretation of the GPL.
>
> This would get us headlines, all right, but the wrong kind.
I agree with that as well. The GPL does not prohibit commercial
distribution. It does prohibity proprietary/closed source distribution.
Commercial: Of or relationg to commerce.
The GPL does not prevent that in any way. I have actually had our
attorney review the MySQL terms, and he says there a crock.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
