Thread: Query regarding pg_prewarm extension
Hi PostgreSQL Community,
I have a question regarding the use of the pg_prewarm()
function [1]
in the pg_prewarm
extension. The function requires a relation name
and a range of pages (e.g., pages 10 to 50) to be warmed by shifting
them from disk to the buffer cache.
How can I decide which range of pages to prewarm?
I assume that it is related to hot pages in the relation,
but how can I identify which pages are likely to be hot
before they are even in the buffer cache?
Additionally, since tuples within a page can move to
different pages over time (due to operations like VACUUM FULL
or REINDEX
),
how should I handle this when selecting the pages to prewarm?
Any insights would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Ayush Vatsa
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/pgprewarm.html#PGPREWARM-FUNCS
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:16:16 +0530 Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810@gmail.com> wrote: > How can I decide which range of pages to prewarm? > I assume that it is related to hot pages in the relation, > but how can I identify which pages are likely to be hot > before they are even in the buffer cache? > Additionally, since tuples within a page can move to > different pages over time (due to operations like VACUUM FULL or > REINDEX), how should I handle this when selecting the pages to > prewarm? For my part, I've only used the block offsets when I wanted to fire off several jobs in parallel, attempting to prewarm a relation faster. I've never tried to track the location of specific rows for purposes of prewarming. You might try the "autoprewarm" feature. After adding pg_prewarm to your shared_preload_libraries, it will automatically keep track of the contents of the buffer cache and after a restart it will automatically prewarm the buffer cache with the blocks that were there before. https://www.enterprisedb.com/blog/autoprewarm-new-functionality-pgprewarm Alternatively you could just prewarm a few of your most important hot tables and indexes with a script after restarts. For most smaller databases, slightly slower performance for a short period after startup isn't a problem - while reading blocks from disk for the first time. After the first read, blocks that are frequently accessed will remain in the cache. The Postgres cache management algorithm works well in general. This is my two cents, anyway -Jeremy -- http://about.me/jeremy_schneider