Re: Query regarding pg_prewarm extension - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Query regarding pg_prewarm extension
Date
Msg-id Z3Lak9lbQ51LzBLi@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query regarding pg_prewarm extension  (Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 10:54:21PM +0530, Ayush Vatsa wrote:
> When I initially read the documentation, I found it unclear how someone
> would practically use the range feature. For instance, how would a user
> determine the specific range of pages they need in the buffer cache?
> Since PostgreSQL doesn’t store data in a fixed order and the order can
> change over time due to operations like vacuum or updates, this could
> be confusing. Hence, an example illustrating the use case would be
> valuable.
> 
> > Another equally legitimate use case would be if the user only wanted
> > to prewarm a subset of the relation... Actually, I'd imagine that's
> > probably more common than someone trying to speed this up by kicking
> > off multiple queries each with their own range.
> 
> To me, using a range of pages to prewarm a relation doesn’t seem like a
> common use case. For example, if a user calls prewarm(100, 200),
> how would they decide those specific numbers? While it’s possible to
> inspect the contents of those pages, as Jeremy noted, users typically
> don’t track the location of specific rows for prewarming purposes.

Yeah, the ranage-of-blocks case is rare, and I hoped to explain it in
the docs, but it seems like that isn't helping, so I retract my patch.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ayush Vatsa
Date:
Subject: Re: Query regarding pg_prewarm extension
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Progressive explain