Thread: [MASSMAIL]Fixup some StringInfo usages
Similar to f736e188c, I've attached a patch that fixes up a few misusages of the StringInfo functions. These just swap one function call for another function that is more suited to the use case. I've also attached the patch that I used to find these. That's not intended for commit. I feel like it's a good idea to fix these soon while they're new rather than wait N years and make backpatching bug fixes possibly harder. I've attached a file with git blame commands to identify where all of these were introduced. All are new to PG17. Any objections? David
Attachment
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 12:53:21PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > Similar to f736e188c, I've attached a patch that fixes up a few > misusages of the StringInfo functions. These just swap one function > call for another function that is more suited to the use case. > > I've also attached the patch that I used to find these. That's not > intended for commit. > > I feel like it's a good idea to fix these soon while they're new > rather than wait N years and make backpatching bug fixes possibly > harder. > > I've attached a file with git blame commands to identify where all of > these were introduced. All are new to PG17. > > Any objections? Looks reasonable to me. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > Similar to f736e188c, I've attached a patch that fixes up a few > misusages of the StringInfo functions. These just swap one function > call for another function that is more suited to the use case. > I feel like it's a good idea to fix these soon while they're new > rather than wait N years and make backpatching bug fixes possibly > harder. +1. Looks good in a quick eyeball scan. regards, tom lane
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 14:27, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > > Similar to f736e188c, I've attached a patch that fixes up a few > > misusages of the StringInfo functions. These just swap one function > > call for another function that is more suited to the use case. > > > I feel like it's a good idea to fix these soon while they're new > > rather than wait N years and make backpatching bug fixes possibly > > harder. > > +1. Looks good in a quick eyeball scan. Thank you to both of you for having a look. Pushed. David