It is really confusing to use UPSERT as a table name in a sql to demo the usage of INSERT INTO UPSERT...ON CONFLICT. How about using a different table name to show the same thing? Just a suggestion.
On 8/15/22 8:41 AM, Y Liu wrote:
> RE: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/UPSERT
> <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/UPSERT>
>
> It is really confusing to use UPSERT as a table name in a sql to demo
> the usage of INSERT INTO UPSERT...ON CONFLICT. How about using a
> different table name to show the same thing? Just a suggestion.
The page in reference has the following line at the top:
"This Wiki page was only maintained until a few weeks before commit,
where the patch further evolved in some minor aspects (most notably, the
syntax became ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE/NOTHING). It is now only of historic
interest."
(though the wiki is editable).
There are several examples in the docs here with less confusing labeling:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-insert.html
Thanks,
Jonathan
