UPSERT as a table name is confusing - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Y Liu
Subject UPSERT as a table name is confusing
Date
Msg-id 86847680.1859611.1660567267467@mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: UPSERT as a table name is confusing  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-www

It is really confusing to use UPSERT as a table name in a sql to demo the usage of INSERT INTO UPSERT...ON CONFLICT. How about using a different table name to show the same thing? Just a suggestion.

Thanks,
Eugene

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Marcel Hofstetter
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL package download for Solaris 11.4
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: UPSERT as a table name is confusing