Thread: Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files

Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files

From
Greg Stark
Date:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> So this means that in less-than-bleeding-edge kernels, syncfs can
> only be regarded as a dangerous toy.  If we expose an option to use
> it, there had better be large blinking warnings in the docs.

Isn't that true for fsync and everything else related on
less-than-bleeding-edge kernels anyways?

-- 
greg