Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HPoKR9i+xpNJMrjOFuKdT3ususw8n6HwKjRx0JTEQQRmg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> So this means that in less-than-bleeding-edge kernels, syncfs can
> only be regarded as a dangerous toy.  If we expose an option to use
> it, there had better be large blinking warnings in the docs.

Isn't that true for fsync and everything else related on
less-than-bleeding-edge kernels anyways?

-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication vs. 2PC
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies