Thread: 35.9.2. Base Types in C-Language Functions
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/xfunc-c.html Description: In "Table 35-1. Equivalent C Types for Built-in SQL Types", when SQL type is "timestamp", the C type is reported to be "Timestamp * ", whereas it is actually "Timestamp". I experienced it in version 9.3 but I guess it is also the case in current version. Best regards
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:59:42PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/xfunc-c.html > Description: > > In "Table 35-1. Equivalent C Types for Built-in SQL Types", when SQL type is > "timestamp", the C type is reported to be "Timestamp * ", whereas it is > actually "Timestamp". I experienced it in version 9.3 but I guess it is also > the case in current version. Ah, yes, you are right --- Timestamp is an int64. I will fix that with the attatched patch. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
Attachment
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:09:04PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:59:42PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/xfunc-c.html > > Description: > > > > In "Table 35-1. Equivalent C Types for Built-in SQL Types", when SQL type is > > "timestamp", the C type is reported to be "Timestamp * ", whereas it is > > actually "Timestamp". I experienced it in version 9.3 but I guess it is also > > the case in current version. > > Ah, yes, you are right --- Timestamp is an int64. I will fix that with > the attatched patch. Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee