Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: 35.9.2. Base Types in C-Language Functions - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 35.9.2. Base Types in C-Language Functions
Date
Msg-id 20200826230904.GE13370@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to 35.9.2. Base Types in C-Language Functions  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: 35.9.2. Base Types in C-Language Functions  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Tree view 
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:59:42PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> 
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/xfunc-c.html
> Description:
> 
> In "Table 35-1. Equivalent C Types for Built-in SQL Types", when SQL type is
> "timestamp", the C type is reported to be "Timestamp * ", whereas it is
> actually "Timestamp". I experienced it in version 9.3 but I guess it is also
> the case in current version.

Ah, yes, you are right --- Timestamp is an int64.  I will fix that with
the attatched patch.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?