Thread: typedef SegmentNumber

Hello,

Here's a rebase of a refactoring patch that got lost behind a filing
cabinet on another thread even though there seemed to be some
agreement that we probably want something like this[1].  It introduces
a new type SegmentNumber, instead of using BlockNumber to represent
segment numbers.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 1:00 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/

That should be:

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20190429130321.GA14886%40alvherre.pgsql#7e4ed274b6552d6c5e18a069579321c9

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:00:00PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a rebase of a refactoring patch that got lost behind a filing
> cabinet on another thread even though there seemed to be some
> agreement that we probably want something like this[1].  It introduces
> a new type SegmentNumber, instead of using BlockNumber to represent
> segment numbers.

+1, and looks good to me!