On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:00:00PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a rebase of a refactoring patch that got lost behind a filing
> cabinet on another thread even though there seemed to be some
> agreement that we probably want something like this[1]. It introduces
> a new type SegmentNumber, instead of using BlockNumber to represent
> segment numbers.
+1, and looks good to me!
