Thread: pgAdmin3 fork/resurrection for PostgreSQL 10+ support

On lundi, 7 janvier 2019 20.34:52 h CET Sami Kuhmonen wrote:
> As far as I understood this would be the correct place to communicate about
> this.
>
> Due to a lot of people missing the support for PostgreSQL 10+ in pgAdmin3 I
> have decided to resurrect the tool and add support for new versions to it.
> As far as I understand this is all fine licensing-wise and I have added a
> repository on GitHub for this and will be providing binaries at least for
> Windows. (https://github.com/Symbiatch/pgAdmin3)
>
> I would still like to ask if there is any problem with this, should I
> somehow specifically note in the application that it is an unofficial fork
> of pgAdmin3, and whatever suggestions anyone would have for this situation.
> All advice is welcome.
>
> --
>  Sami Kuhmonen
> Tokavuh Technologies oy

Hello Sami, thanks for the effort I know some people that will welcoming this
effort.

Just a question, did your fork also support new strong authentification sha256
available since PG 10 ?

--

Bruno Friedmann
 Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch
 Bareos Partner, openSUSE Member, fsfe supporter
 GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227
 irc: tigerfoot

On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Sami Kuhmonen wrote:

> Due to a lot of people missing the support for PostgreSQL 10+ in pgAdmin3 I
> have decided to resurrect the tool and add support for new versions to it.
> As far as I understand this is all fine licensing-wise and I have added a
> repository on GitHub for this and will be providing binaries at least for
> Windows. (https://github.com/Symbiatch/pgAdmin3)

Thanks.  I continue to maintain pgadmin3 on Fedora because pgadmin4
is not ready yet.  And because it seems like pgadmin4 is some sort of
webapp (although I could be wrong).

-- 
           Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@gathman.org>
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.