Thread: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading

Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading

From
Keith Fiske
Date:
Ran into an issue trying to help a customer get PostgreSQL running on CentOS7. 


Specifically when they got to the Post Installation instructions. The way the headings are arranged makes this look like a completely distinct set of instructions when they're in fact specifically only for the distro provided packages. Had me confused a bit as well since I couldn't figure out how they got the initialization command without the full path as well as non-versioned service names. Seems it just needs to be made more clear that these instructions are ONLY for the distro provided packages.

--
Keith Fiske
Senior Database Engineer
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com

Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading

From
"Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Hi Keith,

On 10/22/18 8:23 PM, Keith Fiske wrote:
> Ran into an issue trying to help a customer get PostgreSQL running on
> CentOS7. 
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
>
> Specifically when they got to the Post Installation instructions. The
> way the headings are arranged makes this look like a completely distinct
> set of instructions when they're in fact specifically only for the
> distro provided packages. Had me confused a bit as well since I couldn't
> figure out how they got the initialization command without the full path
> as well as non-versioned service names. Seems it just needs to be made
> more clear that these instructions are ONLY for the distro provided
> packages.

So if I'm understanding correctly, should we make the "Included in
distribution" and "Post-installation" headers both "<h3>" (instead of
"<h2>")?

Thanks,

Jonathan


Attachment

Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading

From
"Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
On 10/23/18 12:59 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On 10/22/18 8:23 PM, Keith Fiske wrote:
>> Ran into an issue trying to help a customer get PostgreSQL running on
>> CentOS7. 
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
>>
>> Specifically when they got to the Post Installation instructions. The
>> way the headings are arranged makes this look like a completely distinct
>> set of instructions when they're in fact specifically only for the
>> distro provided packages. Had me confused a bit as well since I couldn't
>> figure out how they got the initialization command without the full path
>> as well as non-versioned service names. Seems it just needs to be made
>> more clear that these instructions are ONLY for the distro provided
>> packages.
>
> So if I'm understanding correctly, should we make the "Included in
> distribution" and "Post-installation" headers both "<h3>" (instead of
> "<h2>")?
>

Proposed patch attached. I also debated rearranging the
"Post-installation" and "Included in distro" sections, but I think to do
something like that would require more wordsmithing. This should at
least help with the current readability a bit.

Thanks,

Jonathan

Attachment

Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading

From
"Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
On 10/23/18 2:35 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 10/23/18 12:59 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> On 10/22/18 8:23 PM, Keith Fiske wrote:
>>> Ran into an issue trying to help a customer get PostgreSQL running on
>>> CentOS7. 
>>>
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
>>>
>>> Specifically when they got to the Post Installation instructions. The
>>> way the headings are arranged makes this look like a completely distinct
>>> set of instructions when they're in fact specifically only for the
>>> distro provided packages. Had me confused a bit as well since I couldn't
>>> figure out how they got the initialization command without the full path
>>> as well as non-versioned service names. Seems it just needs to be made
>>> more clear that these instructions are ONLY for the distro provided
>>> packages.
>>
>> So if I'm understanding correctly, should we make the "Included in
>> distribution" and "Post-installation" headers both "<h3>" (instead of
>> "<h2>")?
>>
>
> Proposed patch attached. I also debated rearranging the
> "Post-installation" and "Included in distro" sections, but I think to do
> something like that would require more wordsmithing. This should at
> least help with the current readability a bit.

I went ahead and pushed this. Thanks for reporting.

Jonathan


Attachment

Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading

From
Keith Fiske
Date:


On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:22 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
On 10/23/18 2:35 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> On 10/23/18 12:59 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> On 10/22/18 8:23 PM, Keith Fiske wrote:
>>> Ran into an issue trying to help a customer get PostgreSQL running on
>>> CentOS7. 
>>>
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
>>>
>>> Specifically when they got to the Post Installation instructions. The
>>> way the headings are arranged makes this look like a completely distinct
>>> set of instructions when they're in fact specifically only for the
>>> distro provided packages. Had me confused a bit as well since I couldn't
>>> figure out how they got the initialization command without the full path
>>> as well as non-versioned service names. Seems it just needs to be made
>>> more clear that these instructions are ONLY for the distro provided
>>> packages.
>>
>> So if I'm understanding correctly, should we make the "Included in
>> distribution" and "Post-installation" headers both "<h3>" (instead of
>> "<h2>")?
>>
>
> Proposed patch attached. I also debated rearranging the
> "Post-installation" and "Included in distro" sections, but I think to do
> something like that would require more wordsmithing. This should at
> least help with the current readability a bit.

I went ahead and pushed this. Thanks for reporting.

Jonathan


Sorry, was away from PC for several days.

Ideally the "Post Installation" heading should be a subheading under "Included in distro" since that's what it technically is. So changing "Included in distro" back to match the heading of "PostgreSQL Yum Repository" like it was before would be the ideal fix. As things are now, it looks like "Included in Distro" is a subheading under the PGDG Repo instructions.


--
Keith Fiske
Senior Database Engineer
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com

Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading

From
"Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
On 10/26/18 4:46 PM, Keith Fiske wrote:
>
> Ideally the "Post Installation" heading should be a subheading under
> "Included in distro" since that's what it technically is. So changing
> "Included in distro" back to match the heading of "PostgreSQL Yum
> Repository" like it was before would be the ideal fix. As things are
> now, it looks like "Included in Distro" is a subheading under the PGDG
> Repo instructions.

Thanks for the suggestion, I've pushed up this change.

IMHO I think it would be good to rename "Included in Distribution" in
some way to make it clear there are post-installation instructions
available as well, but I don't have any ideas coming to me at the moment.

Jonathan




Attachment