Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading
Date
Msg-id c50df122-188d-2ce3-c649-44b08600b96a@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading  (Keith Fiske <keith.fiske@crunchydata.com>)
Responses Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-www
Hi Keith,

On 10/22/18 8:23 PM, Keith Fiske wrote:
> Ran into an issue trying to help a customer get PostgreSQL running on
> CentOS7. 
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
>
> Specifically when they got to the Post Installation instructions. The
> way the headings are arranged makes this look like a completely distinct
> set of instructions when they're in fact specifically only for the
> distro provided packages. Had me confused a bit as well since I couldn't
> figure out how they got the initialization command without the full path
> as well as non-versioned service names. Seems it just needs to be made
> more clear that these instructions are ONLY for the distro provided
> packages.

So if I'm understanding correctly, should we make the "Included in
distribution" and "Post-installation" headers both "<h3>" (instead of
"<h2>")?

Thanks,

Jonathan


Attachment

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Matthijs van der Vleuten
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove stickiness from navigation bar in docs
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Redhat Post Installation instructions misleading