Thread: Comment fixes in create_grouping_paths() add_paths_to_append_rel()

Comment fixes in create_grouping_paths() add_paths_to_append_rel()

From
Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Hi
Here are two patches fixing comments.

0001
A comment in add_paths_to_append_rel() mentions the number of paths
instead of number of workers by mistake. Fixed it.

0002
Commit b5635948ab165b6070e7d05d111f966e07570d81 added a single
grouping_sets_data argument instead of two lists related to grouping
sets to create_grouping_paths(), but forgot to update the prologue of
the function. Fixed it.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

Attachment

Re: Comment fixes in create_grouping_paths()add_paths_to_append_rel()

From
Stephen Frost
Date:
Greetings Ashutosh,

* Ashutosh Bapat (ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com) wrote:
> Here are two patches fixing comments.

Thanks!

> 0001
> A comment in add_paths_to_append_rel() mentions the number of paths
> instead of number of workers by mistake. Fixed it.

This looks alright.

> 0002
> Commit b5635948ab165b6070e7d05d111f966e07570d81 added a single
> grouping_sets_data argument instead of two lists related to grouping
> sets to create_grouping_paths(), but forgot to update the prologue of
> the function. Fixed it.

This also looks good, but misses a similar mishap from that commit, in
the function header of get_number_of_groups().

Patch attached.

Will push soon.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment

Re: Comment fixes in create_grouping_paths() add_paths_to_append_rel()

From
Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Greetings Ashutosh,
>
> * Ashutosh Bapat (ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com) wrote:
>> Here are two patches fixing comments.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> 0001
>> A comment in add_paths_to_append_rel() mentions the number of paths
>> instead of number of workers by mistake. Fixed it.
>
> This looks alright.
>
>> 0002
>> Commit b5635948ab165b6070e7d05d111f966e07570d81 added a single
>> grouping_sets_data argument instead of two lists related to grouping
>> sets to create_grouping_paths(), but forgot to update the prologue of
>> the function. Fixed it.
>
> This also looks good, but misses a similar mishap from that commit, in
> the function header of get_number_of_groups().
>

Thanks. The changes look good.


-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company