Thread: Problem with Package for pgq3 missing pgq_node

Re: Jeremy Finzel 2017-12-21 <CAMa1XUiwGtTNi_5zZ-JMsAWByPRk0LxjFa52VmrkpUHxvnh=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
> This recent package appears to be broken for pgq3!
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1eR2Lv-0003h7-FC@atalia.postgresql.org
> 
> There is no pgq_node.control file (postgresql-9.6-pgq3), meaning the
> package won't update properly.  Since this is only a package version change
> this seems like a mistake.

Hi Jeremy,

sorry for the late reply.

skytools3 was split into a plethora of separate packages, and we
haven't yet packaged all of them (but we needed to jump ahead because
skytools3 didn't support PostgreSQL 10).

I've packaged pgq-node now, please let us know if there's still
problems.

Thanks for spotting,
Christoph

Re: Jeremy Finzel 2018-01-22 <CAMa1XUirA6bwV+Q-hwE5mGDU2dUNFjS=s1Pqinb6NNo4ZYjhmw@mail.gmail.com>
> Thanks for the reply.  We still are missing some things to make us able to
> actually run Skytools replication with the new packaging, namely londiste.
> The new packages do not fully replicate the functionality of the legacy
> skytools packaging, and we are forced to pin to older versions at present
> for this reason.
> 
> If there is anything we could do to help with this process, please let us
> know.

Hi Jeremy,

I'll see if I can package londiste over the next days. Sorry for the
trouble...

Christoph

Re: To Jeremy Finzel 2018-01-27 <20180127203121.GA29140@msg.df7cb.de>
> Re: Jeremy Finzel 2018-01-22 <CAMa1XUirA6bwV+Q-hwE5mGDU2dUNFjS=s1Pqinb6NNo4ZYjhmw@mail.gmail.com>
> I'll see if I can package londiste over the next days. Sorry for the
> trouble...

Hi Jeremy,

I just finished packaging londiste (python3-londiste). It's basically
untested except for some basic "does it load" test because I'm not
using it, so feedback would be very welcome.

Christoph