Thread: [pgsql-www] pg10 doc breadcrumb/header
if you're in any previous version of the docs (9.6, 9.5, etc) then you see two lines: one for "10" and one for "devel". but when you click into the pg10 documentation this is collapsed into a single link. if you clicked "devel" then the url has devel, but if you clicked "10" then the url has 10. seems like something we wouldn't have intended. just wanted to point it out so we can address it. :) -Jeremy -- http://about.me/jeremy_schneider -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
that was supposed to be "current" rather than "devel" maybe this is intentional since 10 and current are the same thing? still seems inconsistent between the "current" and "10" urls -J On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com> wrote: > if you're in any previous version of the docs (9.6, 9.5, etc) then you > see two lines: one for "10" and one for "devel". > > but when you click into the pg10 documentation this is collapsed into > a single link. if you clicked "devel" then the url has devel, but if > you clicked "10" then the url has 10. seems like something we > wouldn't have intended. just wanted to point it out so we can address > it. :) > > -Jeremy > > -- > http://about.me/jeremy_schneider -- http://about.me/jeremy_schneider -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com> wrote:
that was supposed to be "current" rather than "devel"
maybe this is intentional since 10 and current are the same thing?
still seems inconsistent between the "current" and "10" urls
-J
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Jeremy Schneider
<schneider@ardentperf.com> wrote:
> if you're in any previous version of the docs (9.6, 9.5, etc) then you
> see two lines: one for "10" and one for "devel".
>
> but when you click into the pg10 documentation this is collapsed into
> a single link. if you clicked "devel" then the url has devel, but if
> you clicked "10" then the url has 10. seems like something we
> wouldn't have intended. just wanted to point it out so we can address
> it. :)
I will admit I still don't understand what you're referring to here.
Are you asking for there to be a way from doc pages in /current/ to explicitly link to the /10/ version, for permanent linkage?
On 10/06/2017 10:09 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Jeremy Schneider > <schneider@ardentperf.com <mailto:schneider@ardentperf.com>> wrote: > > that was supposed to be "current" rather than "devel" > > maybe this is intentional since 10 and current are the same thing? > still seems inconsistent between the "current" and "10" urls > > -J > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Jeremy Schneider > <schneider@ardentperf.com <mailto:schneider@ardentperf.com>> wrote: > > if you're in any previous version of the docs (9.6, 9.5, etc) then you > > see two lines: one for "10" and one for "devel". > > > > but when you click into the pg10 documentation this is collapsed into > > a single link. if you clicked "devel" then the url has devel, but if > > you clicked "10" then the url has 10. seems like something we > > wouldn't have intended. just wanted to point it out so we can address > > it. :) > > > I will admit I still don't understand what you're referring to here. > > Are you asking for there to be a way from doc pages in /current/ to > explicitly link to the /10/ version, for permanent linkage? I have asked for that before (the other way round). https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/63641a45-36fc-a8d2-69e4-e150cfbfa032@2ndquadrant.com -- Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36 http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
> On 10/06/2017 10:09 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> I will admit I still don't understand what you're referring to here. >> >> Are you asking for there to be a way from doc pages in /current/ to >> explicitly link to the /10/ version, for permanent linkage? Well when you put it that way, maybe that is what I'm asking for. I thought I was just pointing out an inconsistency on the website. :) Anyway it seems to me like an inconsistency. I'm not sure if these listservs support images, but I've tried to attach some small screenshots to this email that show what I was talking about. -J -- http://about.me/jeremy_schneider -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
Attachment
> On 10/06/2017 10:09 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> I will admit I still don't understand what you're referring to here.
>>
>> Are you asking for there to be a way from doc pages in /current/ to
>> explicitly link to the /10/ version, for permanent linkage?
Well when you put it that way, maybe that is what I'm asking for. I
thought I was just pointing out an inconsistency on the website. :)
Anyway it seems to me like an inconsistency. I'm not sure if these
listservs support images, but I've tried to attach some small
screenshots to this email that show what I was talking about.
How about this?
Current | Supported versions: 9.3 / 9.4 / 9.5 / 9.6 / 10 | Development versions: devel | Unsupported versions: 7.2 / 7.3 / 7.4 / 8.0 / 8.1 / 8.2 / 8.3 / 8.4 / 9.0 / 9.1 / 9.2
If you are on the 10 "site" the current link would remain active and if you are on the current "site" the 10 link would remain active.
David J.