Thread: [BUGS] BUG #14655: PostgreSQL 9.6 not compatible with QTS latest release
[BUGS] BUG #14655: PostgreSQL 9.6 not compatible with QTS latest release
From
duane.una.harland@gmail.com
Date:
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 14655 Logged by: Duane Harland Email address: duane.una.harland@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.6.0 Operating system: Qnap's QTS 4.3.3.0174 (linux under the hood) Description: This is aimed, I think, at the pgsql-hackers list. I am hoping that you can help. I've been using postgreSQL to underpin a media-wiki on my Qnap NAS box (works flawlessly). Qnap has recently released a firmware/os update which has meant that the previously available postgreSQL 9.6.0 no longer loads. An earlier version 9.3.13 is still available but can't access the database created with 9.6. Qnap helpdesk suggested contacting the PostgreSQL community to let you know, and hopefully someone can put together a working release. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14655: PostgreSQL 9.6 not compatible with QTS latest release
From
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
Qnap has recently released
a firmware/os update which has meant that the previously available
postgreSQL 9.6.0 no longer loads.
The only people who could help based upon this is those who are in the same situation...
You are going to have to provide logging showing actual errors if you expect to get any reasonable amount of help from anyone else not using this product.
You might also want to describe how it is that 9.6 was installed on this machine in the first place. And what kind of "linux under the hood" is involved if you know.
David J.
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14655: PostgreSQL 9.6 not compatible with QTS latest release
From
Duane Harland
Date:
Dear David,
Thank you very much for the quick reply. I appreciate that. It is a very reasonable answer and mostly what I was expecting. The installation was from a prepackaged "app" on the NAS. So I was hoping that there may be someone looking after that in the project team (who would be understandably outraged about Qnap's downgrade), but I am also not surprised or upset that it is not the case. Qnap NAS is not really a major target.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:58 AM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
Qnap has recently released
a firmware/os update which has meant that the previously available
postgreSQL 9.6.0 no longer loads.The only people who could help based upon this is those who are in the same situation...You are going to have to provide logging showing actual errors if you expect to get any reasonable amount of help from anyone else not using this product.You might also want to describe how it is that 9.6 was installed on this machine in the first place. And what kind of "linux under the hood" is involved if you know.David J.
--
Dr Duane Harland
35 Woodville Street, Leeston 7632
New Zealand
P: +64 3 3248386E: duane.una.harland@gmail.com
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14655: PostgreSQL 9.6 not compatible with QTS latest release
From
"David G. Johnston"
Date:
If it turns out that there is a place for the PostgreSQL team, would it be best to interact directly with the hackers mail list or was my use of the web form ok?
I would personally use the pgsql-general list as that has the widest readership and is also the most appropriate location. The hackers of PostgreSQL watch that list so you'll have their attention. They would move it over to -hackers if indeed they need to modify the source code for some reason.
David J.