Thread: new list group
Hi, I want to create a new list group, called "Associations". This would hold pgus-general and pgeu-general. The only visible change is that we would have one more submenu in archives.postgresql.org and www.postgresql.org/community/lists Anyone care strongly enough against the idea to object? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:23 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hi, > > I want to create a new list group, called "Associations". This would > hold pgus-general and pgeu-general. The only visible change is that we > would have one more submenu in archives.postgresql.org and > www.postgresql.org/community/lists > > Anyone care strongly enough against the idea to object? Not objecting but what is the definition that you are using for the grouping? Joshua D. Drake > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. > -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company,serving since 1997
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:23 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to create a new list group, called "Associations". This would > > hold pgus-general and pgeu-general. The only visible change is that we > > would have one more submenu in archives.postgresql.org and > > www.postgresql.org/community/lists > > > > Anyone care strongly enough against the idea to object? > > Not objecting but what is the definition that you are using for the > grouping? The associations go into the Associations group. The current Regional group keeps the language-specific lists. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:41 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Not objecting but what is the definition that you are using for the > > grouping? > > The associations go into the Associations group. The current Regional > group keeps the language-specific lists. Seems a weird break out but it certainly isn't going to hurt anything. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company,serving since 1997
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 15:52:27 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:41 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Not objecting but what is the definition that you are using for the > > > grouping? > > > > The associations go into the Associations group. The current Regional > > group keeps the language-specific lists. > > Seems a weird break out but it certainly isn't going to hurt anything. > Don't forget to add spi, that too is an association for postgresql related activities. -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
Alvaro Herrera a écrit : > Hi, > > I want to create a new list group, called "Associations". This would > hold pgus-general and pgeu-general. The only visible change is that we > would have one more submenu in archives.postgresql.org and > www.postgresql.org/community/lists > > Anyone care strongly enough against the idea to object? > PostgreSQLFR is also an association. Even if PGFR has its own mailing list server (http://listes.postgresql.fr), the pgsql-fr-generale list is the main communication tool of the association. Furthermore, pgsql-fr-generale is not really a "regional" mailing-list because it gathers "french-speaking" people regardless where they live. I guess it's the same thing for Spanish, and other languages that are spoken in multiple countries. Maybe a category named "language specific lists" would suit better. Anyway, thanks for your work Alvarro :) -- damien clochard http://dalibo.org | http://dalibo.com