Thread: Sourceforge and torrenst updated
Hi, I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents. Regards, -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
And Neil has updated Freshmeat ... On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > > Hi, > > I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents. > > Regards, > > -- > The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Monday 09 January 2006 18:11, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents.
>
Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't find them... are
you just waiting on the pginstaller folks?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat > Sent: 10 January 2006 14:22 > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Sourceforge and torrenst updated > > On Monday 09 January 2006 18:11, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents. > > > > Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't > find them... are > you just waiting on the pginstaller folks? We have never put them on sf. Dunno if someone else does. Regards, Dave.
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 10:33, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> > Sent: 10 January 2006 14:22
> > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> > Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Sourceforge and torrenst updated
> >
> > On Monday 09 January 2006 18:11, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents.
> >
> > Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't
> > find them... are
> > you just waiting on the pginstaller folks?
>
> We have never put them on sf. Dunno if someone else does.
>
I have put them up in the past after "you" have built them and put them on the
ftp server... hence he (devrim) might be waiting for you (pginstaller folks)
to build them.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: 10 January 2006 16:01 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Devrim GUNDUZ > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Sourceforge and torrenst updated > > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 10:33, Dave Page wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org > > > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat > > > Sent: 10 January 2006 14:22 > > > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > > > Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ > > > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Sourceforge and torrenst updated > > > > > > On Monday 09 January 2006 18:11, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents. > > > > > > Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't > > > find them... are > > > you just waiting on the pginstaller folks? > > > > We have never put them on sf. Dunno if someone else does. > > > > I have put them up in the past after "you" have built them > and put them on the > ftp server... hence he (devrim) might be waiting for you > (pginstaller folks) > to build them. <shrug> "We" built them and published them last Friday morning. What's the deal with the quotes anyway - I thught you were calling me 'coreboy' these days :-p /D
Hi, On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Robert Treat wrote: >> I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents. > > Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't find them... are > you just waiting on the pginstaller folks? If we upload Windows binaries, then we need to upload RPMs to (and also other binaries). That would be a pain. So I've just uploaded source codes. Regards, -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 13:11, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> >> I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents.
> >
> > Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't find them... are
> > you just waiting on the pginstaller folks?
>
> If we upload Windows binaries, then we need to upload RPMs to (and also
> other binaries). That would be a pain. So I've just uploaded source codes.
>
Not if you approach it practically (verses politically) Source code
downloads basically exclude the entire windows user base, while
including the *nix user base. Adding win32 binaries balances this out.
Furthermore the majority of people who have trouble using our ftp mirror
system are windows users, so having another outlet to send them to is
really a bonus (and the pgfoundry website doesnt compete with
sourceforges distribution system)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 11:08, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]
> > Sent: 10 January 2006 16:01
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Devrim GUNDUZ
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Sourceforge and torrenst updated
> >
> > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 10:33, Dave Page wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org
> > > > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
> > > > Sent: 10 January 2006 14:22
> > > > To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
> > > > Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ
> > > > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Sourceforge and torrenst updated
> > > >
> > > > On Monday 09 January 2006 18:11, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents.
> > > >
> > > > Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't
> > > > find them... are
> > > > you just waiting on the pginstaller folks?
> > >
> > > We have never put them on sf. Dunno if someone else does.
> > >
> >
> > I have put them up in the past after "you" have built them
> > and put them on the
> > ftp server... hence he (devrim) might be waiting for you
> > (pginstaller folks)
> > to build them.
>
> <shrug> "We" built them and published them last Friday morning. What's
> the deal with the quotes anyway - I thught you were calling me 'coreboy'
> these days :-p
>
I thought you were getting confused with my use of pronouns, was just
trying to clarify... coreboy. :-P
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
On 10/1/06 19:05, "Robert Treat" <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 13:11, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Robert Treat wrote: >> >>>> I've added new release to sf.net. Also updated the torrents. >>> >>> Whats the deal with the windows binaries on sf? I couldn't find them... are >>> you just waiting on the pginstaller folks? >> >> If we upload Windows binaries, then we need to upload RPMs to (and also >> other binaries). That would be a pain. So I've just uploaded source codes. >> > > Not if you approach it practically (verses politically) Source code > downloads basically exclude the entire windows user base, while > including the *nix user base. Adding win32 binaries balances this out. > Furthermore the majority of people who have trouble using our ftp mirror > system are windows users, so having another outlet to send them to is > really a bonus (and the pgfoundry website doesnt compete with > sourceforges distribution system) Is it worth the effort though? We have thousands of downloads a month, yet we see maybe one or two 'I can't download' messages on webmaster@ in the same period and many of those fall into the 'I tried one which timed out, therefore none of them work' category. Regards, Dave.