Thread: And now for an example of a different style of website
Let's think a little more "Out of the box" here: http://www.actden.com (We warned, this is a site that shows off technology like MS Office, etc) But the point is, instead of getting stuck on the argument of the details, you guys (I'm not helping out here for the moment, so count me out) should look at the big picture again. This site takes _a different approach_. It's _end user oriented_ in a different way than what you've all been looking at. Take the opportunity here to do something pretty nifty... just cause. :) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- Executive Director Digital Distribution Global Training Services Pty. Ltd. Premier OpenOffice.org and StarOffice Online Training providers http://www.digitaldistribution.com
cute site ... and another 'fixed width one' ... just curious, but who is all crying for 'variable width'? I *really* like the consistency a fixed width site provides, so that no matter what your browser, or screen resolution, the site will still look the same ... On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Justin Clift wrote: > Let's think a little more "Out of the box" here: > > http://www.actden.com > > (We warned, this is a site that shows off technology like MS > Office, etc) > > But the point is, instead of getting stuck on the argument of the > details, you guys (I'm not helping out here for the moment, so > count me out) should look at the big picture again. > > This site takes _a different approach_. It's _end user oriented_ > in a different way than what you've all been looking at. > > Take the opportunity here to do something pretty nifty... just > cause. :) > > Regards and best wishes, > > Justin Clift > > -- > Executive Director > Digital Distribution Global Training Services Pty. Ltd. > Premier OpenOffice.org and StarOffice Online Training providers > http://www.digitaldistribution.com > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Marc, > cute site ... and another 'fixed width one' ... just curious, but who is > all crying for 'variable width'? I *really* like the consistency a fixed > width site provides, so that no matter what your browser, or screen > resolution, the site will still look the same ... The trick is that a fixed width site needs to be usable at 800x600 resolution, since this is the resolution of 40% of the monitors in American businesses, the last time anyone did stats on it (2000, I think). -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > Marc, > > > cute site ... and another 'fixed width one' ... just curious, but who is > > all crying for 'variable width'? I *really* like the consistency a fixed > > width site provides, so that no matter what your browser, or screen > > resolution, the site will still look the same ... > > The trick is that a fixed width site needs to be usable at 800x600 resolution, > since this is the resolution of 40% of the monitors in American businesses, > the last time anyone did stats on it (2000, I think). Agreed ... that just means the width is fixed at the 800, that's all ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 14:29, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Marc,
> >
> > > cute site ... and another 'fixed width one' ... just curious, but who is
> > > all crying for 'variable width'? I *really* like the consistency a fixed
> > > width site provides, so that no matter what your browser, or screen
> > > resolution, the site will still look the same ...
> >
> > The trick is that a fixed width site needs to be usable at 800x600 resolution,
> > since this is the resolution of 40% of the monitors in American businesses,
> > the last time anyone did stats on it (2000, I think).
>
> Agreed ... that just means the width is fixed at the 800, that's all ...
>
<sigh> do we have to go over this again... different users have
different monitor sizes. People with big monitors want to be able to
resize their browsers to view multiple windows simultaneously. You can't
assume that everyone's window width is 800 pixels: it's too much for
some users and too little for others. It's not that difficult to make a
stretchy site that looks good at multiple widths, I think php.net is a
classic example of this (though debian, kde, mozilla, ximian are also
good examples).
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Robert Treat wrote: > <sigh> do we have to go over this again... different users have > different monitor sizes. People with big monitors want to be able to > resize their browsers to view multiple windows simultaneously. You can't > assume that everyone's window width is 800 pixels: it's too much for > some users and too little for others. It's not that difficult to make a > stretchy site that looks good at multiple widths, I think php.net is a > classic example of this (though debian, kde, mozilla, ximian are also > good examples). just looked at php.net, and you are correct, seems to resize nicely ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Friday 16 January 2004 18:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
> > <sigh> do we have to go over this again... different users have
> > different monitor sizes. People with big monitors want to be able to
> > resize their browsers to view multiple windows simultaneously. You can't
> > assume that everyone's window width is 800 pixels: it's too much for
> > some users and too little for others. It's not that difficult to make a
> > stretchy site that looks good at multiple widths, I think php.net is a
> > classic example of this (though debian, kde, mozilla, ximian are also
> > good examples).
>
> just looked at php.net, and you are correct, seems to resize nicely ...
>
>
mmm... sorry for the tone, guess it was a long week... just that in my former
life I used to be the "user experience adviser" for the IT department of a
fairly good-sized corporation I often went round and round over things like
this with the developers, things that most of "us usability types" consider
basic maxims. Probably why I now work on the database side; everyone
*thinks* they can do design, but people rarely look at a website and think
"they should have used 3 tables and a view to handle that data" :-)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Robert, > Probably why I now work on the database side; everyone > *thinks* they can do design, but people rarely look at a website and think > "they should have used 3 tables and a view to handle that data" :-) You should meet some of my clients: Exec: "I think we should unify everything on MySQL." Me: "But MySQL won't support our reporting tools." Exec: "Of course it will." Me: "When did MySQL add support for UNION queries and custom functions?" Exec: "I don't know. I don't understand this database stuff. That's what I have you for." Me: sigh Really ..... -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Josh Berkus wrote: > Robert, > > > Probably why I now work on the database side; everyone > > *thinks* they can do design, but people rarely look at a website and think > > "they should have used 3 tables and a view to handle that data" :-) > > You should meet some of my clients: > > Exec: "I think we should unify everything on MySQL." > Me: "But MySQL won't support our reporting tools." > Exec: "Of course it will." > Me: "When did MySQL add support for UNION queries and custom functions?" > Exec: "I don't know. I don't understand this database stuff. That's what I > have you for." > Me: sigh *rofl* we should have an anecdotes section for stuff like this on our web site ;) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Josh Berkus said: > The trick is that a fixed width site needs to be usable at 800x600 resolution, > since this is the resolution of 40% of the monitors in American businesses, > the last time anyone did stats on it (2000, I think). CSS can provide for this with the concept of a max-width attribute (name might be slightly off). You can design a variable-width page that will work on 800x600, and have it expand on larger browsers, not to exceed a certain point, so that you don't end up with paragraphs of text on a single line at 1600x1200. The caveat is that I'm not sure how well browsers support this. I know that some do, and some don't, as always. Depending on the distribution of support, this might be enough to satisfy those that want fixed-width and those that want variable-width. Steve Simms Database Developer & Administrator Medical Media Systems, Inc.
Justin Clift wrote: > This site takes _a different approach_. It's _end user oriented_ > in a different way than what you've all been looking at. You guys got this all wrong. This is the site we want to imitate: http://www.ijg.org/
would make the whole translation issue alot simpler :) On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Justin Clift wrote: > > This site takes _a different approach_. It's _end user oriented_ > > in a different way than what you've all been looking at. > > You guys got this all wrong. This is the site we want to imitate: > > http://www.ijg.org/ > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664