Thread: pl/pgsql capabilities?

pl/pgsql capabilities?

From
Ferenc Engard
Date:
Hi all,

A long time ago (at version 6.3.2 or what :) I have asked, but maybe
since it changed: can I use the procedural languages (any of them) to
return a table- (or view-) like output, just like in Interbase, for
example? E.g., if I have a metamodel and I want to write functions what
perform complex computations and queries, can they return the result
(which can be of many rows) to the client?

Thank you:
Circum





Re: pl/pgsql capabilities?

From
Roberto Mello
Date:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:43:29AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> A long time ago (at version 6.3.2 or what :) I have asked, but maybe
> since it changed: can I use the procedural languages (any of them) to
> return a table- (or view-) like output, just like in Interbase, for
> example? E.g., if I have a metamodel and I want to write functions what
> perform complex computations and queries, can they return the result
> (which can be of many rows) to the client?

As of PG 7.2 you can, by returning a cursor:

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-cursors.html

-Roberto

-- 
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu/ USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club |------+ Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU -
http://www.brasileiro.net/      http://www.sdl.usu.edu/ - Space Dynamics Lab, Developer    
 
I wonder if Singapore has any computer pirateers or hackers...




Re: pl/pgsql capabilities?

From
Ferenc Engard
Date:
> > since it changed: can I use the procedural languages (any of them) to
> > return a table- (or view-) like output, just like in Interbase, for
> > example? E.g., if I have a metamodel and I want to write functions what
> > perform complex computations and queries, can they return the result
> > (which can be of many rows) to the client?
> 
> As of PG 7.2 you can, by returning a cursor:
> 
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-cursors.html

If I understand well, I can create a cursor for a SELECT statement, and
return that cursor. Well, it is better than nothing, but I fear it is
not flexible enogh for me.

Here is an example from an interbase app. I have to declare that this is
not my program, and I do not know IB, so forgive me if I say silly
things...

CREATE PROCEDURE VIEW_1_1 
( SZEMPONTID INTEGER, PARENT CHAR(10) CHARACTER SET WIN1250, ELNEVEZESTIPUSID INTEGER, RENDSZERKOD CHAR(16) CHARACTER
SETWIN1250
 
)
RETURNS
( CHILD VARCHAR(10) CHARACTER SET WIN1250, GYERMEKDB INTEGER, OSZTALYTIPUSID INTEGER, NORMATIVNEV VARCHAR(30) CHARACTER
SETWIN1250, TIPUSNEV VARCHAR(30) CHARACTER SET WIN1250, NORMATIVKOD VARCHAR(30) CHARACTER SET WIN1250, TIPUSKOD
VARCHAR(30)CHARACTER SET WIN1250
 
)
AS
BEGIN FOR   SELECT D1.CHILD, D2.TYPEID   FROM HIERARCHIA D1, OSZTALY D2   WHERE     D1.PARENT = :PARENT AND
D1.SZEMPONTID=:SZEMPONTIDAND     D1.CHILD = D2.OSZTALYKOD   ORDER BY D1.SORREND   INTO :CHILD, :OSZTALYTIPUSID DO BEGIN
 SELECT COUNT(CHILD) FROM HIERARCHIA WHERE PARENT = :CHILD AND
 
SZEMPONTID = :SZEMPONTID INTO :GYERMEKDB;   EXECUTE PROCEDURE VIEW_ELNEVEZES(:ELNEVEZESTIPUSID, :RENDSZERKOD,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, :CHILD, NULL)   RETURNING_VALUES :NORMATIVNEV, :TIPUSNEV, :NORMATIVKOD,
:RENDSZERKOD;   SUSPEND; END
END

The point is not what this proc does (in summary, it gets all the childs
with their properties of a parent in a tree structure), but it cannot
gather all the information with just one select, e.g. it gets some data
from another (nontrivial) stored procedure.

As I see, that 'suspend' command gives back the actual row (and the
control) to the caller until it fetches the next row from this proc's
return value. Do I interpret correct that this stored proc returns a
cursor with structure described in the 'RETURNS' part, and which is not
linked to a SELECT statement?

Can I do something similar in PG? If not now, maybe in the (near)
future?

Thanks:
Circum





Re: pl/pgsql capabilities?

From
Roberto Mello
Date:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:37:08AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote:
> 
> If I understand well, I can create a cursor for a SELECT statement, and
> return that cursor. Well, it is better than nothing, but I fear it is
> not flexible enogh for me.

Maybe not for the solution you have right now, but you most likely can
rework things a bit to make it work.
> Here is an example from an interbase app. I have to declare that this is
> not my program, and I do not know IB, so forgive me if I say silly
> things...
> 
> CREATE PROCEDURE VIEW_1_1 
> (
>   SZEMPONTID INTEGER,
>   PARENT CHAR(10) CHARACTER SET WIN1250,
>   ELNEVEZESTIPUSID INTEGER,
>   RENDSZERKOD CHAR(16) CHARACTER SET WIN1250
> )
...
> The point is not what this proc does (in summary, it gets all the childs
> with their properties of a parent in a tree structure), but it cannot
> gather all the information with just one select, e.g. it gets some data
> from another (nontrivial) stored procedure.
> 
> As I see, that 'suspend' command gives back the actual row (and the
> control) to the caller until it fetches the next row from this proc's
> return value. Do I interpret correct that this stored proc returns a
> cursor with structure described in the 'RETURNS' part, and which is not
> linked to a SELECT statement?
> 
> Can I do something similar in PG? If not now, maybe in the (near)
> future?

Not in the way you currently have, as far as I could understand it. I didn't 
read the procedure very attentively because it's horribly written in all caps, 
and my eyes started scrambling the letters half way through.

-Roberto

-- 
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu/ USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club |------+ Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU -
http://www.brasileiro.net/      http://www.sdl.usu.edu/ - Space Dynamics Lab, Developer    
 
"Data! I thought you were dead!" "No, Sir. I rebooted."