Thread: PREPARE and stuff
Suppose a web application with persistent database connections. I have some queries which take longer to plan than to execute ! I with there was a way to issue a PREPARE (like "PERSISTENT PREPARE"). Now all Postgres connections would know that prepared statement foo( $1, $2, $3 ) corresponds to some SQL query, but it wouldn't plan it yet. Just like a SQL function. When invoking EXECUTE foo( 1,2,3 ) on any given connection the statement would get prepared and planned. Then on subsequent invocations I'd just get the previously prepared plan. Is this planned ?
PFC wrote: > > Suppose a web application with persistent database connections. > I have some queries which take longer to plan than to execute ! > > I with there was a way to issue a PREPARE (like "PERSISTENT PREPARE"). > Now all Postgres connections would know that prepared statement foo( > $1, $2, $3 ) corresponds to some SQL query, but it wouldn't plan it yet. > Just like a SQL function. > When invoking EXECUTE foo( 1,2,3 ) on any given connection the > statement would get prepared and planned. Then on subsequent invocations > I'd just get the previously prepared plan. How would that be different from the current PREPARE/EXECUTE? Do you mean you could PREPARE in one connection, and EXECUTE in another? If you're using persistent connections, it wouldn't be any faster than doing a PREPARE once in each connection. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Well, that's not completely trivial => the plan might depend upon the concrete value of $1,$2 and $3. Andreas -- Ursprüngl. Mitteil. -- Betreff: [PERFORM] PREPARE and stuff Von: PFC <lists@peufeu.com> Datum: 23.06.2007 21:31 Suppose a web application with persistent database connections. I have some queries which take longer to plan than to execute ! I with there was a way to issue a PREPARE (like "PERSISTENT PREPARE"). Now all Postgres connections would know that prepared statement foo( $1, $2, $3 ) corresponds to some SQL query, but it wouldn't plan it yet. Just like a SQL function. When invoking EXECUTE foo( 1,2,3 ) on any given connection the statement would get prepared and planned. Then on subsequent invocations I'd just get the previously prepared plan. Is this planned ? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
"PFC" <lists@peufeu.com> writes: > Suppose a web application with persistent database connections. > I have some queries which take longer to plan than to execute ! There have periodically been discussions about a shared plan cache but generally the feeling is that it would do more harm than good and there are no plans to implement anything like that. For a web application though you would expect to be executing the same queries over and over again since you would be executing the same pages over and over again. So just a regular prepared query ought to good for your needs. You do not want to be reconnecting to the database for each page fetch. Replanning queries is the least of the problems with that approach. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Well, that's not completely trivial => the plan might depend upon the > concrete value of $1,$2 and $3. When you use PREPARE, it doesn't. I could live with that. The purpose of this would be to have a library of "persistent prepared statements" (just like lightweight functions) for your application, and maximize the performance of persistent connections.