Thread: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin
I'm currently trying to make a decision on whether to use the Cygwin port of Postgres 7.4 or Postgres 8.0 for a windows installation. Can someone provide some comparison info from a performance point of view? I was thinking that the Cygwin port has the overhead of the translation layer, but 8.0 is a newer product and may still have performance issue. Can anyone comment on this?
Thanks for the help.
Scott
PostgreSQL 8 for windows faster AND more reliable :) Chris Scott Goldstein wrote: > I'm currently trying to make a decision on whether to use the Cygwin > port of Postgres 7.4 or Postgres 8.0 for a windows installation. Can > someone provide some comparison info from a performance point of view? > I was thinking that the Cygwin port has the overhead of the translation > layer, but 8.0 is a newer product and may still have performance issue. > Can anyone comment on this? > > Thanks for the help. > > Scott
Scott Goldstein <sgoldstein@apache.org> writes: > I'm currently trying to make a decision on whether to use the Cygwin port of Postgres 7.4 or Postgres 8.0 for a windowsinstallation. Can someone provide some comparison info from a performance point of view? I was thinking that theCygwin port has the overhead of the translation layer, but 8.0 is a newer product and may still have performance issue. Can anyone comment on this? Well, the performance issues of the cygwin-based releases are the stuff of legend ;-). New product or no, this is really a no-brainer. regards, tom lane