Tom Lane wrote:
> lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca writes:
> > The attached zip file (os2port.zip) contains an os2.diff file that has all
> > the patches for the os/2 port and a file os2newfiles.zip file that has the
> > additional files required for the port.
> > [ 130k diff snipped ]
>
> We were willing to tolerate a port this invasive for Windows, but it's
> real hard to justify adding so much cruft for OS/2.
I agree with Tom on this. The patch is 4k context diff, and the new
files are 30k. It just seems too large for a port we are unlikely going
to be able to test or maintain. I think it is like the Netware port
where we rely out port-specific folks to maintain a patch. We can
mention the patch URL in the FAQ, and already have an OS/2 link there.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073