Thread: FW: CREATE LANGUAGE/pg_language docs
I posted this last week but have had no responses and haven't seen it on the unapplied patches list :-( Can someone confirm that my posts are getting through (I know they're getting as far as the archives) as this has happened to me a number of times recently with posts to the PostgreSQL lists (of course, I could have just been killfiled by everyone I 'spose :-) ). Regards, Dave. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Page > Sent: 14 June 2002 11:14 > To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org > Subject: CREATE LANGUAGE/pg_language docs > > > This patch updates the CREATE LANGUAGE & pg_language docs for > the 7.3 table structure. > > Regards, Dave. >
Attachment
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> I posted this last week but have had no responses and haven't seen it on
> the unapplied patches list :-(
> Can someone confirm that my posts are getting through
Yeah, I saw it. I suppose Bruce hasn't entirely caught up yet ...
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: > > I posted this last week but have had no responses and haven't seen it on > > the unapplied patches list :-( > > Can someone confirm that my posts are getting through > > Yeah, I saw it. I suppose Bruce hasn't entirely caught up yet ... Yep, applied now. I was working on patches myself and I get behind. I was going to cycle through my email box again today anyway. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 20 June 2002 16:45 > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] FW: CREATE LANGUAGE/pg_language docs > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: > > > I posted this last week but have had no responses and > haven't seen > > > it on the unapplied patches list :-( Can someone confirm that my > > > posts are getting through > > > > Yeah, I saw it. I suppose Bruce hasn't entirely caught up yet ... > > Yep, applied now. I was working on patches myself and I get > behind. I was going to cycle through my email box again today anyway. Thanks Bruce. Didn't mean to hassle you but having looked at some of the patches going through I thought you had got up to date a few days ago. My bad... Cheers, Dave.