Thread: pg_dump UDT/function dependency patch

pg_dump UDT/function dependency patch

From
Philip Warner
Date:
Patch to put rudimentary dependency support into pg_dump. This addresses
the UDT/function order problem. Unfortunately, this is not a small patch so
I would prefer some debate about whether it should be applied 7.1.

 *        - Rudimentary support for dependencies in archives. Current
implementation
 *              uses dependencies to modify the OID used in sorting TOC
entries.
 *              This will NOT handle multi-level dependencies, but will
manage simple
 *              relationships like UDTs & their functions.
 *
 *        - Treat OIDs with more respect (avoid using ints, use macros for
 *              conversion & comparison).

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/

Attachment

Re: pg_dump UDT/function dependency patch

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes:
> Patch to put rudimentary dependency support into pg_dump. This addresses
> the UDT/function order problem. Unfortunately, this is not a small patch so
> I would prefer some debate about whether it should be applied 7.1.

Looks good to me.  A large part of the bulk appears to be changes to
not treat OIDs as integers, which is a necessary bug fix anyway.

One small stylistic quibble:

+#define oidcmp(x,y) ( (x < y ? -1 : (x > y) ?  1 : 0))
+#define oideq(x,y) (x == y)

These need more parentheses to be safe:

+#define oidcmp(x,y) ( ((x) < (y) ? -1 : ((x) > (y)) ?  1 : 0))
+#define oideq(x,y) ((x) == (y))

            regards, tom lane

Re: pg_dump UDT/function dependency patch

From
Philip Warner
Date:
At 20:22 31/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>One small stylistic quibble:
>

Applied & always welcome. Also sent to CVS...


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/