Thread: Vote Release number of the next.

Vote Release number of the next.

From
Hiroshi Saito
Date:
Hi.

I think the vote of the next release number.

1.) 09.01.0300
many patch is a bug-fix support. and, psqlODBC is not intended
to be synchronized with postgres version number.

2.) 09.02.0100
new version is desirable because test code that contains.

3.) 09.03.0100
we want to have a postgres release the next number.

==
I vote to 1.) , I think the major version up, when there is a
change of more features and desirable.
thanks!

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito


Re: Vote Release number of the next.

From
ljwilson
Date:
I also vote for 09.01.0300. I thought since we were compiling with 9.1
PostgreSQL headers that is where the "09.01" came from, or is that just a
happy coincidence?

Thanks...jack



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Vote-Release-number-of-the-next-tp5755600p5755696.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - odbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Vote Release number of the next.

From
Dave Page
Date:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi@winpg.jp> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think the vote of the next release number.
>
> 1.) 09.01.0300
> many patch is a bug-fix support. and, psqlODBC is not intended
> to be synchronized with postgres version number.

Yes it is -  we used to have some users get confused about what they
should use, so we decided to link the version number to the current
database server version number. There is no technical reason for
linking them.

> 2.) 09.02.0100
> new version is desirable because test code that contains.
>
> 3.) 09.03.0100
> we want to have a postgres release the next number.
>
> ==
> I vote to 1.) , I think the major version up, when there is a
> change of more features and desirable.
> thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-odbc mailing list (pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-odbc



--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Re: Vote Release number of the next.

From
Dave Page
Date:
Which, btw, means it should really be 09.02.0100, unless we're going
to change the scheme.

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi@winpg.jp> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I think the vote of the next release number.
>>
>> 1.) 09.01.0300
>> many patch is a bug-fix support. and, psqlODBC is not intended
>> to be synchronized with postgres version number.
>
> Yes it is -  we used to have some users get confused about what they
> should use, so we decided to link the version number to the current
> database server version number. There is no technical reason for
> linking them.
>
>> 2.) 09.02.0100
>> new version is desirable because test code that contains.
>>
>> 3.) 09.03.0100
>> we want to have a postgres release the next number.
>>
>> ==
>> I vote to 1.) , I think the major version up, when there is a
>> change of more features and desirable.
>> thanks!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiroshi Saito
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-odbc mailing list (pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-odbc
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Re: Vote Release number of the next.

From
"Inoue, Hiroshi"
Date:
(2013/05/16 16:22), Dave Page wrote:
> Which, btw, means it should really be 09.02.0100, unless we're going
> to change the scheme.

Now I'm inclined to 9.2.0100.
Version 9.2 should have been released before and then
the next release would be the last release of 9.2.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue




Re: Vote Release number of the next.

From
ljwilson
Date:
Now that I understand the version history a little better, I'm changing my
vote for the next psqlodbc release number to 09.02.0100 .

Thanks...jack



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Vote-Release-number-of-the-next-tp5755600p5755961.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - odbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: Vote Release number of the next.

From
Hiroshi Saito
Date:
Hi.

this is a candidate after some discussion's,
I will mark in Ver 09.02.0100.!
thanks all.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito